Dr. Peter Duesberg: The Scientist Behind the Discovery of HIV/AIDS

Flat earth Christian: This exposes the lies, deception, motivated reasoning and evil behind some/most of science. The Bible says man is a proud, hypocrite that cannot be trusted and here we see many sure examples of it. The rabbit hole runs deep to man's pact with hell, the place created for the devil and his angels. It is not just in science. It is full spectrum, across all man's institutions. The good in the world is mostly from God and the evil in the world is mostly from man though God is forced to judge and pit evil against evil. The truth is for those with eyes that can see and ears that can hear.

United Kingdom on Jan 23, 2021

Ken Burke: At last the demolition of the AIDS nonsense. Tales of AIDS and the so-called Human Immunity "Virus" abound to this day in our mainstream media, but did you know that all are carefully contrived lies built on a mountain of bad data concocted in bad faith by corrupt researchers to defraud the American Health System out of billions of dollars of grant money? With an impeccable pedigree in the field of biological research, Mr Duesberg uses his investigative powers with scalpel-like precision to strip away the lies that created the AIDS myth and lay bare the truth. This book was published in 1996: why have no journalists read it? A monumental, important work.

United Kingdom on Feb 08, 2019

RAS: Ce livre est une grande ressource pas seulement sur le sida mais sur l'histoire de la médecine : ainsi on en apprend énormément sur la théorie des germes, sur quelques fiascos de la science du passé tel le SMON au Japon. Mais bien entendu la grosse partie du gros livre est sur le sida et comment, selon Duesberg, le virus HIV a été rendu coupable. Ses arguments sont riches et bien construit, que cela plaise à la théorie officielle, il faut se confronter à ces arguments. Duesberg est souvent présenté comme un personnage peu crédible, ici on voit aussi que c'est un grand scientifique qui avait déjà une longue carrière dans le domaine des rétrovirus. Son livre se lit comme un thriller. Le livre est d'ailleurs traduit en français sous le titre "L'invention du virus du sida".

France on Jun 23, 2018

Laura B.: "Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong."
-Thomas Jefferson

One of the largest mass murders in world history has been successfully covered up by the state through their control of schools and media. HIV does not cause AIDS. It never did, and our government and leading scientists have always known this fact. Our own doctors poisoned us without even knowing what they were doing; just blindly following authority figures and trying to hold on to their medical licenses. 650,000 human beings murdered in the U.S. alone with medically prescribed variants of the deadly chemotherapy HIV drug AZT, and other cleverly disguised lies .

The proof of this is easily verified. If HIV were really the cause of AIDS, and AIDS was really sexually transmissible then why hasn't AIDS simply decimated Latin America by now? Are all of the HIV carriers in Latin America being given expensive antiviral drugs at the expense of their governments as well? Why aren't we hearing on the news stories of the overwhelming cost of medicating illegal aliens who have HIV? Why aren't illegal aliens dying in the street in...

United States on Jun 29, 2016

Zatopove: It has now been nearly 30 years since "HIV" has been declared to be a PROBABLE cause of "AIDS" and it looks like that it remained so until now. An epidemic of epic proportions that was declared back then never happened, this truly horrible infectious disease did not spread into the general population, it remained strictly confined to the "risk group" population. My interest in all this started with the documentary "House of Numbers" which I watched in 2012. The revelations in the film were shocking, the way HIV testing is done, the AZT and its side effects that are the same as AIDS symptoms, in short - it doesn't take a long time to understand what is going on!

Back to the book, it is an essential reading as it clearly explains events at the time when AIDS first appeared. The book itself, although being published in the 90's, is as relevant today as it was back then as the time that has passed since its publication speaks in its favor. There is no epidemic! AIDS - this awful sexually transmitted infectious disease does not spread as every other disease caused by viruses spreads - I don't think that it is necessary to say anything else despite the usual propaganda by the...

United Kingdom on Sep 18, 2013

john: This is a most wonderful book and a real eye-opener. I think everybody should read it. The whole world should be informed about the malpractices of the medical establishment. Of course this is not only about the aids-myth because when you know what they - the medical-pharma-cartel - do in this case you can imagine what they do in all their daily practices and reconsider if you ever want to consult them again. I admire the author, Peter Duesberg, for his courage and straighforwardness and his unrelenting faithfulness to real science and not to make-belief. He deserves the Nobel-prize.

United Kingdom on Sep 16, 2012

Cathleen M. Walker: Silence=Death. That's what the Act Up movement has been screaming for years. Then why the effort to silence Duesberg, who is only asking for scientific review of the "evidence" that HIV causes AIDS? It is the effort to silence Duesberg that actually adds to his credibility, the massive effort to keep his thoughts, questions and ideas from the mass of individuals who might start asking their own questions. Aren't we taught to ask questions of our doctors? Aren't we taught that we have to take responsibility for our own well being? Why is it that Duesberg is considered such a threat to the medical establishment? Who benefits by his silence? Who loses if the truth comes out?
From the first chapter: "our leading scientists and policymakers cannot demonstrate that their efforts have saved a single life." Who benefits from testing and "treating" the "high risk" communities who are, more likely, dying from the "treatment" that is *not* saving their lives? "AIDS itself has not yet affected larger numbers of women nor has it entered the heterosexual population outside of drug addicts: nine out of ten AIDS patients is still male, and more than 95 percent still fall into the same risk...

United States on Jul 28, 2000